Few changes made in final Tongass forest plan decision

Part of the Tongass National Forest in April 2008. (Creative Commons photo by Xa’at)
Part of the Tongass National Forest in April 2008. (Creative Commons photo by Xa’at)

The Tongass Land Management Plan amendment, a 16-year transition toward young-growth logging, was finalized Friday. Tongass Forest Supervisor Earl Stewart signed the record of decision after considering objections from environmental and industry groups. Some have applauded the decision and others are unsatisfied. But regardless of sides, not much has changed in the Forest Service’s move away from old-growth timber.

Listen Now

The U.S. Forest Service released the final record of decision for the Tongass amendment without many changes from its earlier draft.The plan offers an average of 46 million board feet each year, the same volume the earlier draft called for, but far below the glory days of the timber industry. More old growth will be offered during the first 10 years, almost three times the projected 12 million feet of young growth.

The Tongass National Forest includes most of Southeast Alaska. (Image courtesy U.S. Forest Service.)
The Tongass National Forest includes most of Southeast Alaska. (Image courtesy U.S. Forest Service.)

During the last five, young-growth volumes will more than double and old growth will be almost cut in half. At the end of the 16-year transition, only 5 million feet of old growth will be provided for small sales and specialty products.

Some of those objecting to the draft plan called for a full inventory of young, or second growth, trees. Environmental groups argue a completed inventory will show a faster transition is possible. But industry groups argue the exact opposite. Tongass Supervisor Stewart addressed the concern in a press conference, saying 50,000 acres will be inventoried by 2018.

“The data collection and everything is being housed will continue to be assessed as we work through this project, and so it certainly could change,” Stewart said. “At this point it’s only partially finished because 2016 was the first year of actual on-the-ground inventory.”

Forest Service tree expert Sheila Spores said a large portion of young-growth stands slated for logging were first cut in the 1950s and 1960s. She noted that the agency is aware of how many stands are on the Tongass. She said today’s regulatory standards will be applied to inventory available stands.

Stewart explained that any young-growth acreage made unavailable may be swapped for additional lands elsewhere.

“There’s an adaptive management strategy that seeks to recognize the ongoing young-growth inventory and seeks to monitor the projected verses the actual harvest over time,” Stewart said. “The result of the adaptive management strategy is reviewing the effectiveness of that adaptive management process in about five or 10 years.”

The decision explains that if amounts of timber harvested vary enough from estimations, those issues could be addressed in another amendment.

The decision was met with mixed results from environmental groups. Some applauded the decision, saying the plan protected several salmon-producing watersheds referred to as the “Tongass 77.”

“The thing the plan did do that was very good for conserving resources on the Tongass is identify the key areas that need to be taken off the table for timber harvest,” said Andrew Thoms, a Tongass Advisory Committee and Sitka Conservation Society member. “Everybody agreed that the top salmon-producing watersheds on the Tongass shouldn’t have any more old-growth harvest.”

The committee was made of 15 members from conservation, logging and Native interests.  Thoms noted that he would like to see old-growth logging end immediately, but said the amendment is the best compromise.

Other environmental groups argued in press releases that the decision’s language didn’t set the old-growth harvest volumes in stone during the transition. Others say they feel comfortable with the plan being finalized prior to President-elect Donald Trump taking office.

Shelly Wright of Southeast Conference, an economic development group, argues the decision was made without enough information.

“So what we’re asking for is a comprehensive inventory and a financial analysis before the transition accelerates,” Wright said. She disagrees with the accelerated plan and said there’s nothing wrong the 2008 forest plan’s transition. “They are transitioning at a pace that’s economically feasible for the industry in Southeast Alaska.”

The Tongass plan decision does say the Forest Service will monitor market demands and make changes through its adaptive management plan. Tongass Supervisor Stewart also mentioned that a study is being developed to examine ways to make young-growth products profitable.

The plan will go into effect on January 8.

Previous articleLake Clark search-and-recovery for missing plane stalled by ice fog
Next articleMAPP releases results of Community Health Needs Assessment

No posts to display