Alaska is changing how it tracks the pandemic. Here’s what you need to know.

A woman swabs someone's nose.
Dr. Ellen Hodges tests a Bethel resident at a COVID-19 testing event hosted by the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation in Bethel, Alaska on Nov. 7, 2020. The state is now tracking COVID-19 by looking at trends over time rather than granular data as they did at the beginning of the pandemic. (Katie Basile/KYUK)

Omicron is now the dominant COVID variant in Alaska, and it’s changing the way the health department looks at the pandemic.

The state’s public health officials say they’ll now be tracking COVID-19 more like they have always tracked the flu — looking at trends over time. They’re also putting more focus on different metrics to understand COVID-19’s severity, said Chief Medical Officer Dr. Anne Zink.

One example is the percent positivity rate. That’s the percent of all of the tests for COVID-19 that come back positive. Alaska hit a record 18.35% on Friday.

The percentage used to be a good way to get a sense of the virus’ hold in a community. The higher the number, the more testing needed to be done. But, that’s no longer the case, said Zink.

“It really is changing in its usefulness,” she said. “If we have a lot of people doing at-home tests, we always struggle with some of the smaller facilities in getting reports in.”

RELATED: More Alaska health care workers are out sick or in quarantine as omicron hits

Zink said it’s better to look at the total number of positive cases, which is still an indicator of risk and community spread. Daily case numbers surged to an all-time high last week.

State epidemiologist Louisa Castrodale said Alaskans should be looking at those numbers in broad strokes instead of worrying about daily counts. The state isn’t getting data about all of the at-home positive test results.

“So whether we give you a number that is like, you know, 1,435 versus 1,537, like it’s up,” Castrodale said. “That’s what we want people to take away from it. Knowing that we have community spread, that’s sort of enough to help educate people into what they might want to do for mitigation.”

Public health officials said contact tracing isn’t so useful anymore either and they’re phasing it out. The state hasn’t hammered out the full details, but they say they will be getting rid of some of their contact tracing staff.

“Way back when, it was super important to know exactly where that person had traveled and exactly where that person had been, because there were so few cases, and there really wasn’t community transmission,” Castrodale said.

In other words, contact tracing was useful in interrupting the spread of the disease.  Now, Southeast Regional Public Health Nurse Manager Sarah Hargrave said omicron is moving too fast to catch every case before it spreads.

“When we have a huge number of cases, we really want to focus on those that are the newest, because they would have had less chance to spread it around to other people. The ones that are already 10 days out … they’ve spread it everywhere. As far as they’re going to, at any rate,” said Hargrave.

[Sign up for Alaska Public Media’s daily newsletter to get our top stories delivered to your inbox.]

Public health is “triaging” contact tracing, she said. Instead of trying to reach everyone who’s positive, the state will first contact the newer positive cases and people who are at high risk or who live in group settings, like homeless shelters, mines and assisted living facilities.

Hargrave said public health needs to put its resources back on things like opioid addiction, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases.

As the state changes how it tracks the pandemic in Alaska, local community leaders are having to change how they track it, too. Hargrave said they should be looking at case counts and vaccination rates as they make public health decisions.

State epidemiologist Joe McLaughlin said for people trying to make decisions about their personal level of risk, the most accurate metrics are the number of local hospitalizations and deaths. Case counts are still useful too, he said, even though they aren’t as accurate as they were before due to at-home testing.

Previous articleWinter storm closes Juneau schools, state offices and largest grocery store
Next articleState job vacancies lead to unplowed roads and other service gaps

No posts to display