• Fresh Air + Writers Almanac4:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Menu Schedule Links

Signal Status

There are currently no events to display.

1410_Thank-you-banner

Murkowski Working On Making In-State LNG Line More Feasible

By | January 31, 2013

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski is trying to make a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope more feasible.

Environmentalists are welcoming a stretch of pipeline through Denali National Park.

Senator Murkowski introduced a bill that would allow a seven-mile stretch of pipeline to run through the National Park. For that to happen, Congress needs to pass a law granting approval.

She says it creates an equal playing field for proposed routes along the Richardson and Parks highways.

“Once the decision was made which way to go, we wanted there to be a clear path forward,” Murkowski said.

The pipeline would be buried through the park’s industrial corridor. Jim Stratford says the plan presents the best possible option. He’s the regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association.

“Bearing it along the highway through Denali National Park makes way more sense to us than going to the east and putting a new road or putting a new pipeline in what is essentially virgin wilderness right now,” Stratford said.

And there’s an added boost, says Larry Persily. He’s the federal coordinator for the Alaska Gas Pipeline. He says that in addition to making it easier for producers, this legislation could add to the health of the park’s economy, because it would allow park operators to access some of the cleaner-burning fuel.

“It’s been talked about for years,” Persily said. “If there’s a pipeline nearby there are a lot of environmental and cost advantages to using natural gas for the hotels, for the vehicles, for the businesses, instead of continuing to burn diesel.”

Of course, granting the go-ahead to a seven-mile stretch of what would be a route that extends hundreds of miles is not the major barrier to construction.

That’s something Senator Murkowski readily concedes.

“This did nothing to resolve whether or not we even do it,” Murkowski said. “When you’re looking at alternate routes, if one route is complicated because of the proposed path, if you can correct that ahead of time so that’s not an issue, it doesn’t take away the big issue, which of course, is the price tag.”

And that price tag could total as much as $60 billion.

This bill passed out of the Senate last Congress on a voice vote – meaning there wasn’t any opposition. But it didn’t receive a vote in the House.

So the process begins a new … with votes required in both chambers.

Listen to the full story

Download Audio

You can subscribe to APRN’s newsfeeds via email, podcast and RSS. Follow us on Facebook at alaskapublic.org and on Twitter @aprn.

Comments

Please read our comment guidelines.